I’ve now even blogged about blogging.
I saw Jim Burke at CATE the other day and he mentioned how nicely blogging works within the scope of all the other writing he does.
And he particularly likes the groove he’s fallen into with it as of late.
Funny how I greatly enjoy blogging as well. Truth is, many people told me I should “blog” (whatever the heck that meant) as far back as 2007… but I wasn’t really into it. Wasn’t sure if I’d have anything to say or be able to stick with it or find any joy in it or what not.
Truth is, now that I have been at it for well over a year, I am a bit amazed at my ability to be prolific without really sacrificing any other meaningful part of my life.
Heck, I don’t know what I was doing before I was blogging – probably sleeping (LOL!) – but nowadays I find blogging to be a tool which keeps me sharp as a writer. After all, I must crank out almost 2,000 words a week just for blogs alone — and they can be about anything I want them to be about.
I’ve blogged about politicians, farts, assessment, writing, violence, books, dysfunction, friends, and on and on and on.
Heck, I’ve now even blogged about blogging.
If I do the math of it all, I see this: 2,000 words per week for at least 45 weeks this year is 90,000 words — that’s a 500 page novel I’ve written, easy! (A 500 page novel that I am, btw, not publishing. I mean who’s gonna want to read a book about farting politicians as they dysfunctionally craft policy for school assessment? I know, I know, I’d be surprised.)
The point is, more people should try it. Blogging keeps me sharp as a writer. Muscles that are used stay in better shape than muscles which are too well-rested.
I should know. I just finished yet another new children’s book which my agent read last night and loved… another notch coming in the belt, it looks like.
Blogging doesn’t come at the expense of other writing… blogging, ironically enough, seems to liberate writing.
Whoudda thunk-it?


I am at CATE today, at the The California Association of Teachers of English Annual conference. I love this event. Why?
Since ya’ll know how much I love data-driven assessment, I decided to uncork a wee bit of Super Bowl data and show you why I deserve one of those high-fallutin’ ETS jobs, the kind that pays over six-figures if you are selected to work in the hallowed halls of this “non-profit” institution.
Last week I was part of an amazing banquet where we honored the 2010 California Teachers of the Year in Sacramento. Big kahunas were all over the place. State senators. Educational policy makers from the Department of Ed. And of course, the inimitable State Superintendent of Public Education in California, Jack O’Connell. (Being a part of this crowd is like being a part of my only real Skulls and Bones Society — aside from this ning, that is… LOL!)
I greatly distrust the data I hear. Why? Because the way one presents the data all too often determines the message that the data conveys to the audience. And the less insightful the audience (i.e the more laypersons in the group) the easier it is to spin, spin, spin away.
To many students, the holiday break of 2009 is long gone. But I have a student who will never forget it. That’s because his uncle strangled his aunt to death — and then shot himself in the head in a murder suicide — with his nephew, my ninth grader, in the next room.
As I mentioned the other day, I am a big believer in goals. So much so that I always write them down.
it’s been shown that people who actually write down their goals — the more specific the better — have a significantly higher likelihood of attaining their goals.
New Year’s has never really meant that much to me… because, I suspect, New Year’s for me always hits in September.
With school on break for a couple of weeks I get a chance to wear but one hat and be a writer for a wee bit. I love it!