A Scholastic Author
A Disney Author

Posts Tagged ‘College’

I just don’t get this whole Joe Paterno thing

Posted on November 9, 2011 at 11:29 AM by Alan Sitomer

I just don’t get the whole Joe Paterno thing.

On one hand, if he is in any way complicit to sheltering a monster (see The Sandusky Child Abuse scandal) then why in the world would the university allow him to be on the sidelines this Saturday… and for the rest of the football season?

And if he is not liable – legally or morally – in any manner, then why resign?

One thing which seems clear is that Joe Pa appears to be tone deaf to the severity of this atrocity. I mean why even head to football practice the other day when the news broke? Why not say something like, “Ya know what, I am 100% innocent of any and all allegations but still, since I recognize how heinous this crime is, I am going to show my compassion and understanding by putting football on the back-burner while more serious matters take precedence and sort themselves out a bit.”

After all, the abuse did happen under the umbrella of your football program, Joe – and no one in the history of college football has ever owned a bigger NCAA football umbrella than you, Mr. “Pa” – so take a moment, think about the victims and at least sit out a practice – or even a game or two – simply out of a sense of “doing the right thing”, huh?

That’s what I don’t get. If you are innocent of any and all charges and you sit out for a little bit, then all you did was the right thing while matters sorted themselves out. (And considering the type of crime we are talking about here, it’s hardly something one could consider an “exceptional, undue sacrifice” at all.)

And if things sort out in a way that doesn’t favor you – and goodness knows, we all hope they do not – then you do not deserve to be on the practice field for even one more snap.

But going on with “business as usual”? Especially when it seems that the number one concern by the athletic department was to protect the reputation of the athletic department.

You are an educator, Mr. Paterno. All college coaches are. And what is the lesson being taught by you right now? (Really, I just don’t understand how your actions translate in a positive ways for those sodomized young boys.) I mean look at this paragraph as taken from a news release written after you just had a chance to meet with your team.

Paterno met with his coaching staff and players for about 10-15 minutes in an auditorium of the football facility. Standing at a podium, he told them he was leaving and broke down in tears.

Players gave him a standing ovation when he walked out.

Junior quarterback Stephon Morris said some players also were nearly in tears as Paterno spoke.

“I still can’t believe it,” Morris said. “I’ve never seen Coach Paterno like that in my life.”

Asked what was the main message of Paterno’s talk, Morris said: “Beat Nebraska.”

“Beat Nebraska” is the main message these young men should take from this discussion? I’m dumbfounded.

And is there another “educator” in the land that would have the luxury of being able to return to work with such questions hanging over their head. There’s not a 7th grade social studies teacher in the country who’d be back teaching a lesson on the Bill of Rights if the school district where they worked was bathed in a similar stench. Is this a case of “above the law”? Certainly, by returning for the rest of the season, you are acting like it.

And Penn State, by allowing him to return, you are worse. Where’s your own moral compass in this whole thing. Don’t let Joe retire; let him clear his name and then invite him to coach until he’s 125 years old. But until his actions are scrutinized and cleared, why in the world are you allowing him back to “represent your university and lead your program”?

I just don’t get this whole Joe Paterno thing. As a parent, I am freaked. As an educator, I am freaked. As a citizen of this country, I am freaked. As a fan of college football, Joe Paterno, and sports in general, yep… I am freaked. Can someone please explain to me what is going on right now?

The Discriminatory Bake Sale and Banned Books

Posted on September 27, 2011 at 5:01 AM by Alan Sitomer

Today there is a bake sale at UC Berkeley.

It’s been officially classified as “discriminatory”. People are protesting. In fact, the bake sale itself is a protest.

Should the bake sale be banned? During Banned Books Week it raises some nice questions.

First all, Berkeley is nutso and if you have never been up there, you are just going to have to take my word on this. A lot of people are working very hard to preserve the culture of the 1960′s and some of them are being exceptionally successful. In a state filled with loons, Berkeley holds its own.

Having said that, let’s take a closer look at the Bake Sale menu.

As the L.A. Times reports, “The event is designed to denounce a bill on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk that would allow California public universities to consider race, ethnicity and gender in student admissions.”

The point of the bake sale is, essentially, that if you consider race/gender when it comes to college admissions, why shouldn’t one consider these things when it comes to other areas of our national life? “They” say (the Berkeley College Republicans, that is), “Hey, we are either living in a color blind nation or we are not.”

It’s a loaded question. But it’s a good question, too. As the GOP’s bake sale asks, if we make accommodations for one group of people and not another – based on gender or race – are we not thus practicing a form of nuanced discrimination? And isn’t that potentially the most dangerous type of discrimination – prejudice that doesn’t even believe it’s being prejudiced?

On the other hand, do we ignore history and the mountains of tangible evidence which basically says, “white males rule and all other sub-categories aren’t finding themselves on a level playing field with these dudes?”

I am interested to see how this works out. But in a way, it’s already worked out for the bake sale organizers. Why? Because what they really want to do is draw attention to their cause. In fact, I bet they were hoping someone would ban the bake sale.

You can also ban Happy PotterTo Kill a MockingbirdThe Color Purple and so on, too. But doesn’t banning something just give it more life?

It’s BBW (Banned Books Week). Show ‘em some luv!

Hey aspiring writers, wanna save $50,000? I got a little secret…

Posted on September 2, 2011 at 5:01 AM by Alan Sitomer

Hey aspiring writers, wanna save $50,000? I got a little secret: Skip the MFA program and get yourself a library card.

Before the hate mail launches look, I don’t think for a moment that I just launched any kind of crippling blow to the oh-so-explosive, for-profit industry of MFA Programs in Creative Writing. And I do believe there are certainly some classes, courses, teachers, and so on who very much offer something awesome. However, yesterday I blogged about how I went into the local branch of my library for the first time in a wee bit too long and realized (for the 10,000th time) that these guys are offering the moon. Free. Absolutely free.

See, to be a writer, one must write. No school can get you to do that; it’s all self-determination. And if you are self-determined enough to actually put your butt in a chair and write a book then you also probably have the self-determination to actually read a book, as well. Therefore, being that an MFA program could cost as much as 50K I say, “Take a shot at reading all the books on writing that your local library offers and then see if you still need/want an MFA. At worst, you’ll be the most well-prepared student ever to set foot in an MFA classroom. At best, I just saved you a couple of years and a heck of a lot of money.”

Actually, it was the library that saved you the cash-o-la because they are offering a free creative writing class right now – an awesome one, too – as taught by some of the best professors of writing of all time. (And did I mention it’s at zero cost to the student – above sweat equity, that is? Just want to make sure I cover that.)

Norman Mailer, Stephen King, Anne Lamott, Orson Scott Card, Albert Zuckerman, Lajos Egri, Aristotle, Robert McKee, Lew Hunter, Linda Seger, Ray Bradbury, Christopher Vogler… need I go on? I just listed a dozen writing teachers  and could offer you a dozen more in a heartbeat. If you haven’t read these authors you probably aren’t well-enough prepared to enter an MFA program and if you have read all these authors you will probably find that an MFA program’s best offering to you is workshop space where you can have other aspiring writers read and critique your work (while you do the same for them).

It’s called a writer’s group. For that try Craigslist. Or Google. Or a local library. Some branches even offer those as well.

It’s not that there is no value in “the lecture hall”. But so many people feel they have to drop out of their life, take on zillions of dollars in student loans and spend a coupla years on a college campus to learn what is essentially quite learnable with a touch of gumption and a willingness to return books without incurring too many late fees.

Now, could it also not be argued that any other major offered by a university is also thus available in the same manner? Yes, it could. And yes, it is. However, a college degree has weight in the paper. Filling out a job application and having a college diploma trumps not having one 9 times out of 10. Engineer, lawyer, doctor, accountant, teacher, architect, economist, hedge fund manager, the list goes on and on. But in the world of book publishing, a degree from Oxford, a PhD from Harvard plus a papal coronation of meritorious achievement from (dare I say it) Iowa at best will get you to the top of the slush pile. Degrees mean practically nothing in the world of publishing; having some sort of literary chops does and acquiring those through the study of fiction writing can be had at no cost to those with the fire in their belly.

And to those who do not have the fire in their belly, chances are probably slim to none that they will ever see the publication of book #2 (even if they manage to bang out a book #1) because to be a writer one has gotta have some kinda hunger. Save the cash, support your local library and go get a free, high quality education.

Matter of fact, in preparation for my next book, I just decided to take a few courses on the always available schedule myself. Next up, a class on Scene and Structure from Jack Bickham, a guy who published more than 80 novels in his lifetime.

I say save your money, value your time and get a library card. And if that 50K is really burning a hole in your wallet, go ahead and donate it to the local library… they sure could use the support these days.

NFL Rookie Camp… it’s so, so smart. Society… not so much.

Posted on June 29, 2010 at 5:30 AM by Alan Sitomer

I was at a hotel in Carlsbad, CA on Sunday and aside from amazing weather and really good food, there was something else notable in the air.

NFL Rookie Camp. A mandatory seminar for all NFL rookies.

I saw scores of stud football players just lounging around. (Their workday began Monday… Sunday was check in.)

No need for me to name drop because, truth is, none of these guys have done one darn thing in the world of professional sports… yet. Though a few of them are already multi-millionaires based on their college exploits, draft status and so on, the land of NFL dreams, stardom and so on had not yet hit in full stride in their lives.

But it was cool to see.

And why does the NFL have a Rookie Camp? It’s for the “life” side of being an NFL player. This had nothing to do with weights, 40 yard dash times, 225 lb. reps or any of that. This was where the NFL put all of its rookies through mandatory session on life skills such as…

  • managing your money
  • watching out for gold diggers
  • gambling protocol
  • talking to the media
  • getting ahold of counseling services for drugs, emotional/psychological issues

… stuff like that.

I saw scores of beefy, idolized young men on their way to having a variety of mentors illuminate for them the traps and pitfalls of becoming a professional athlete.

Now, for the NFL, this makes good business sense. Fans pay big money for Super Bowl tix, jerseys, season passes and luxury boxes. Matter of fact, as a tv franchise, the NFL seems immune to any sort of recession whatsoever. Football has always been big yet these days, it’s bigger than ever.

And keeping its players out of the news for jail, arrests, drugs, battery and so on, well, it’s good for the health of the industry. Billionaires know this, which is why they spend a few million teaching these kids some stuff.

Now do the kids learn it? Not all of them. No. But I got to speak to a few and could see that the gravity of what was upon them was already beginning to reframe their thinking.

It got me thinking, what if we put all our young men in this country through some sort of “mentorship” program that was mandatory? A place where they’d get a taste of Scared Straight mixed in with a few “watch out for this pitfall” chats complemented by a “Call this phone number if __X__ happens” and so on.

Would it not make good sense for society? Fiscally, morally, and so on, so may of our young men are just cast adrift and when I looked at how these coddled college athletes were being hand-held all the way through to the doorway of adulthood it made me realize that 1) those that do end up on the police blotters have got to be real klonk-heads because the NFL is going all out in its own way (even if it is just to protect their own investment) and 2) if society showed as much smarts about shepherding ALL young men from boyhood to manhood in a more overt, direct and thoughtfully guided manner, our entire nation would be better served.

NFL Rookie Camp… it’s so, so smart. Society… not so much.

420

Posted on April 22, 2010 at 5:00 AM by Alan Sitomer

So for those of you who do not know, 420 became a slang term for smoking weed back in the 1970′s. There’s actually a really interesting – and funny – article here for those who want to learn a bit about the “history” of the invention of this name.

Tuesday was April 20th… i.e. 4-20.

Colleges struggle with students showing up at 4:20 p.m. on 4-20 to smoke a blunt and then go back to whatever it is that college kids do at 4:21 when they are stoned out of their minds.

Thousands and thousands of college kids do this, mind you… all across the nation.

But attendance on Tuesday was down in my classes/at my school on Tuesday, April 20th. And why?

When I innocently asked Tuesday, after taking role, “Where is everyone today?” one of my kids said, “Do you know what day it is?”

I do… but I didn’t put it together until then. (It was still early in the morning and I don’t really think like a 420 disciple.)

And being that we are on block schedule, I see my kids every other day. That means that on Thursday I will see the Tuesday absentees… and when I do see them, won’t I also be seeing them in a new light? I mean, I know kids smoke pot – I smell it in the halls quite often. However, ditching school to honor the Gods of Ganja?

For those kids on the fence for grades, don’t I now become all the more less likely to “cut ‘em some slack”?

Of course, I might end up wrongly assuming that Kid X was off getting high on Tuesday when they were home with a sore throat (from too many BONG LOADS!) but the fact is, how can my own assessment lens not be at least slightly tainted by such blatant ditching to go get blazed?

Besides, I took role well before noon. 420 doesn’t begin til 4:20.

Don’t pot smoking teens even know how to tell time anymore? School ends at 3:00 p.m. Why miss a class that ended well before 10:00 a.m.?

I know, I know… 420, Dude.

420

Arrrgghh!

Don't Do Stupid Things… But if You Do, Don't Get Famous for Them or Post Pics of It on the Internet

Posted on August 25, 2009 at 5:30 AM by Alan Sitomer

So everyone realizes that virtually every Human Resources person worth their salt at almost any decent-sized organization in this country checks the internet as a means of doing a background check on potential future employees, right? I mean this is something I talk about with my high schoolers. Putting pics of yourself doing beer bongs, smoking out of real bongs, taking off your clothes or being absolutely SMASHED out of you mind on the internet is a bad idea. (Note: I am not naive enough to pretend that my students don’t/will not “party” at some point — especially before they are of legal age to do so — so I warn them about this. However, if you want to debate the “I should be wagging my finger at these kids, not teaching them how to avoid paying the price if they should behave this way” aspect of things, that’s for a different blog post. This one here is zipping off in a different direction.)

And since the internet seems to have a better memory than even the most keen elephant, it’s more important than ever not to do stupid things when you are young that might jeopardize you future ability to be hired for a job even as much as a decade or two later after you have engaged in the stupidness.

Now trust me, I have done stupid things before. Lots of them. But (thankfully) they were before the age of digital cameras/ cell phones with video and YouTube/FaceBook/MySpace and so on. I mean even if those rumors are true about me and the mastodon in the taxidermist’s off back in 1987, there are NO photos to prove it. (And I am not saying they are true, BTW — it’s pure conjecture and there’s no proof!)

So essentially, it’s more important than ever for young folks to try and make sure they don’t do anything that is going to automatically show up as a “top hit” on google when a potential employer decides to do a little “unofficial online bg check” on ya.


And if I could think of one sure way to cause any future employers to NEVER EVER WANT TO DARE HIRE ME, it would probably be because they’d be scared that if they brought me on board, I’d end up getting them embroiled in an expensive, potentially calamitous, possibly frivolous lawsuit. I mean you just don’t want to be young and start looking for jobs in this day and age with the monkey of a, “WARNING: Hire me and I might sue you for absolutely no legitimate reason” sign on your back.

But that doesn’t seem to have stopped this young lady. Meet Trina Thompson, 27, a recent college graduate who is suing the college from which she just graduated because she can’t find a job and feels as if, in some way, it is the college’s fault.

Now I don’t know if Trina is gonna win or not — the college certainly seems to think these allegations are without merit — but doesn’t Trina realize that she just ID’d herself as a person who, if you do hire her, is one of those folks who might slip on a banana peel somewhere in your office and end up trying to bring down your entire business… even if she was the one who ate the original banana in the first place and failed to discard of it properly?

Trina, Trina, Trina, I am not sure what they taught you in college but you do seem to have one thing going for you: your sense of how the real world works appears woefully deficient. You just identified yourself as one of those “suer” types… and folks in HR work long hours not so much to find”great rock star employees” as much as to avoid hiring human train wrecks that are going to do real damage to their business.

And guess which category your top hit on google just put you in?

A Freakin' Money Makin' Machine!! (That's Non-Profit, of course.)

Posted on May 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM by Alan Sitomer

When I was named Teacher of the Year for the state of California in 2007 I was given, among other things, a free trip to Princeton, New Jersey to visit the HQ of ETS.

Talk about georgoeus. I mean this place was Shangra-la.

And all I kept asking myself was, “This place is non-profit?” No freakin’ way. They gotta be hauling in money by the truckload.

The SAT. The PSAT. The AP tests. The GRE.

Holy smokes… is anybody doing the math on these guys? That’s all I could think about my entire stay.

Well, someone did do the math.

Read this and tell me that that something isn’t reminiscent of a famous quote from the play Hamlet.

Here are some highlights:

Last year, the SAT cost $45 for the basic test, which 1.5 million U.S. students took. The College Board does not comment on how much revenue each test brings in, but once you factor in the nearly 222,000 students who received fee waivers from the College Board, you can roughly estimate that SAT revenue was at least $58,360,365. I say at least because many students take the test over and over again, trying to refine their scores to get into better colleges. That’s not to mention the litany of extra fees the College Board charges if you get your scores by phone ($12.50), rush the results ($36.50), or ask for a refund ($7). The real revenue is likely to be millions more than $58,360,365, and that’s before you factor in the foreigners who want a piece of an American education ($26 international processing fee; $23 more if you’re taking it in India or Pakistan).

That’s only the beginning. Many colleges also demand that students take SAT Subject Tests, which are more focused than the broad-ranging SAT. The majority of students who take Subject Tests, which are at least $29 each, sit for three or more. In all, 752,854 Subject Tests were taken, leading to at least $21.8 million in revenue but certainly far more because of the flexible pricing structure.

The PSAT, which serves little purpose besides being a warm-up act for the SAT? $13 per test. In 2006, 2.7 million students took the PSAT for an estimated $35.3 million in revenue, less whatever costs the College Board waived for low-income students.

Then there are the AP exams, which assess whether students have college-level mastery of a subject, usually after taking a corresponding honors course in high school. Having an AP course on your transcript is highly attractive for your college application, just as scoring well on an AP test is highly beneficial once you get to college. So for the elite students in the country, the AP test is a necessary evil, one that costs them $86. In 2008, more than 2.7 million AP tests were taken worldwide. That’s more than $232 million of revenue.

In 2006—the most recent year for which the College Board’s tax returns are available—the College Board brought in a total of $582.9 million of revenue.

Over a half a billion per year for the bubble test industry? When people cry out for change, we have to realize the forces which are in opposition to this change.

And the forces of opposition will always be the folks who are raking in the serious cash. Heck, I’m scared that I’m gonna get a poison blow dart in my neck simply from typing this type of post.

You think Wall Street is worthy of investigation and re-thinking? Might I suggest… twwwppp!

There’s the blowdart!

Powered by WordPress   |   Log in   |   Entries (RSS)   |   Comments (RSS)